USSF & NATO
References from United States Space Force doctrine and NATO interoperability guidance for allied, multi-domain operations.
Standards
Standards-aligned. Sovereignty-aware. Open by default.
Compliance posture for allied, dual-use, and regulated environments — anchored in established defense, civil-space, and cybersecurity references, and engineered to interoperate with European regulatory frameworks.
Reference frameworks
The bodies we align with.
We do not invent compliance — we map onto the frameworks that allied institutions, operators, and procurement programs already trust.
NASA & ESA
Alignment with NASA and ESA technical references for mission assurance, data exchange, and ground-segment interoperability.
MITRE & NIST
MITRE engineering practice and NIST cybersecurity references — including risk management, identity, cryptography, and software supply chain.
NIS2 & DORA
NIS2 cyber-resilience obligations and DORA operational-resilience expectations mapped to platform controls and reporting.
EU AI Act
Categorization, transparency, and oversight obligations for AI components, embedded into the agent and intelligence layer.
ITAR & EAR
Dual-use-aware controls for export-controlled assets and data, enforced at the record level rather than at the perimeter.
Open-standards posture
Interoperable by default. Proprietary only where necessary.
Open standards reduce lock-in, accelerate procurement, and make allied interoperability tractable. The platform commits to open data models, open APIs, and published interface contracts wherever the security envelope allows.
Where confidentiality or export-control regimes require restricted interfaces, those interfaces remain explicitly scoped, documented, and auditable. There are no hidden surfaces.
Compliance principles
How compliance is engineered, not declared.
01
Controls live with the data
Classification, jurisdiction, and access policy are bound to the record. They cannot be stripped by moving the data to a different application.
02
Auditability is continuous
Every relevant action — issuance, transfer, decision — is signed and logged. Compliance reviews are a query, not an archaeological dig.
03
Dual-use is a design constraint
Commercial and defense workloads share architecture but not envelopes. The platform treats dual-use posture as a primary design variable, not an afterthought.
04
Sovereignty is a deployment choice
Operators choose where data and decisions reside. Jurisdictional posture is part of the deployment contract — explicit, enforceable, and auditable.
Standards alignment is not a marketing claim. It is the contract that makes allied, regulated, and dual-use operations possible.
Engage
For procurement, audit, and standards review.
We are happy to walk procurement, compliance, and security teams through the alignment map. Start with the architecture or the security overview.